Jewelers hit back at Human Rights Watch

Leah Meirovich

Jewelers dismissed a Human Rights Watch (HRW) report which claimed companies and the Responsible Jewellery Council (RJC) did not provide sufficient ethical sourcing guarantees.

We have reviewed the Human Rights Watch report and reject the suggestion that RJC has got ‘flawed’ standards, governance and certification systems,” Gerhard Humphreys-de Meyer, communications coordinator for the RJC, told Rapaport News. HRW has itself acknowledged the RJC’s progress in making jewelers more aware of the importance of responsible sourcing and getting them to adopt more responsible practices, he added.

HRW stressed in a report last week that the RJC needed to strengthen its standards and auditing practices. It also ranked 13 major jewelry retailers on responsible sourcing of gold and diamonds, stating that most of the companies [fell] “short of meeting international responsible sourcing standards.” Criteria included the absence of child labor and human rights abuses.

Humphreys-de Meyer argued that the standards the RJC uses were “internationally recognized as robust, and continually open to comprehensive and transparent review.”

Signet Jewelers, which received a moderate rating in the report, said it relied on the RJC to ensure its suppliers practice responsible sourcing. For that reason, all its suppliers must be members of the council, David Bouffard, Signet’s vice president of corporate affairs, told Rapaport News.

RJC membership reinforces Signet’s industry leadership position on responsible practices and requirements in the areas of human rights, health and safety and labor practices throughout the global Signet supply chain,” he said.

Read full article

Source Rapaport